Life Expectancy: 65 Years
Claud
An avid collector of your hopes and worries, a romantic at heart.
She thanks her fairies, for blessing her with people who know compassion down to an art.
For accepting her for who she is, who never fails to turn up,
in times of need as well as happiness, or just there for a loving hug.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
rambling thoughts
what if homosexuality is necessary in humans to control women's fecundity (meaning, the ability of a woman to reproduce n number of children in her life time)? If the whole human population is hetero, then wouldn't the population be doubling at a faster rate which can potentially degrade the environment?
So actually, having homosexuals around can be a positive thing to the larger humanity - that nature passes on genes to certain individuals as a limiting agent to our reproductive capacity.
Which means, if there are more and more humans in this world i.e. we increase birth rates of this world by a large amount, then the only logical conclusion is that there will be more homosexuals around isn't it? Both due to a natural increase in numbers of the population, and also as a limiting stabiliser for the welfare of our community.
And we feel that there is an 'increase' in homosexuals today. But that is also because we have unprecendented numbers today. The growth rates of human population has never been so fast and so large. So if following my line of reasoning and assumption that increasing numbers of humans do degrade the environment, then the growth in number of homosexual male and females will therefore act as a 'limiter' so that our numbers do not grow too large for our own good?
Hahaha...just some rambling thoughts and hypothesis. Of course, I do not profess to know much about this. Just a random-middle-of-the-night thought.
00:01